Wasaby: Water And Soil contamination and Awareness on Breast cancer risk in Young women

Universität zu Lübeck (GER)

To evaluate how the project implementation follows the plans and the achievement of scientific and administrative aims

The leader evaluates if the actions undertaken follows the grant agreement. The action main partner (INT) is responsible for the budget adherence with grant agreement statements
WP3 leader with the project Steering Committee consensus can decide on actions to be taken to resolve problems identified during the evaluation
The evaluation process involves the following

E-mail exchanges to main partner on project progress
E-mail exchanges to other WP leaders in relation to process, output and outcome indicators
Requests for reports of activities from other associated partners to assess consistency between WP activities
Ad hoc conference calls with associated partners and main partner to resolve any problems arising

An interim evaluation is included in the interim report and discussed at Steering Committee meetings
As representative of the European Cancer registry, WP3 leader constantly checks that activities are in the interest of European Cancer Registries
The leader validates the material prepared for Ethical Committees
Evaluation results are disseminated within the Steering Committee of the European Network of Cancer Registries and discussed with Steering Committee members once a year (either in occasion of ENCR Steering Committee meetings, ENCR scientific meetings or via telephone conferences)

D3.1 – Evaluation financial report at M32 synthesizing the financial choices adopted by the associated partners in connection to the project evaluation activities
Other evaluation reports shall be included in the interim and final reports

The 2nd Steering Committee Meeting (included as a WP-1 milestone) is a milestone also for WP3